Mt. Kumgang and Inter-Korean Relations
Background
In late the 1980s, with the end of Cold War, South Korean President Roh Tae Woo began seeking diplomatic ties with China, the USSR, and East European communist countries -- North Korea’s allies. Although these new bilateral relationships had the potential to further isolate North Korea, Roh’s “Nordpolitik” policy, initiated in 1988, also included a thaw in inter-Korean affairs: promoting economic relations with the North.
One year later, Chung Ju Yung, founder of giant Hyundai Group and a refugee himself from the North, was granted permission to visit Pyongyang to discuss economic cooperation, including Mt. Kumgang tourism.[1] With over 12,000 sparkling peaks, Mt. Kumgang or ‘Diamond Mountain’ is considered the most beautiful mountain on the Korean Peninsula.[2] North of the 38th Parallel, Mt. Kumkang became inaccessible to South Koreans after the peninsula was divided into two nations. Chung anticipated a pent-up desire in the South to visit Mt. Kumgang.
However, the talks did not go far. The nuclear crisis in the early 1990s and Pyongyang’s withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) cooled down not only détente between two Koreas, but also the tourism project, which was suspended until the “Sunshine Policy” under the Kim Dae-jung government.
Mt. Kumgang Tourism and “Sunshine Policy”
Kim Dae-jung government’s “Sunshine Policy” in 1998 was a turning point in relations between the two Koreas, since Kim proposed reconciling with the North as a partner. Under these circumstances, Chung Ju Yung visited the North again in 1998, this time crossing the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) with 500 cattle.[3] After returning from the North, Chung submitted a plan for a $ 96 million inter-Korean economic project, which was approved by the ROK government. On October 29, 1998, Hyundai and North Korea's Asia-Pacific Peace Committee (APPC) signed an agreement on the Mt. Kumgang tourism project. The first cruise ship left for Kumgang Mountain on November 18, 1998.
For the Kim Dae-jung administration, Kumgang tourism was a logical cornerstone of its “Sunshine Policy,” which aimed not only to promote inter-Korean economic relations, but also to expand people-to-people exchanges and promote peaceful reconciliation. Hyundai, with its business expertise in the South and personal connections in the North, was the perfect partner. The South Korean government provided both legal and financial support, as described below.
Mt. Kumgang Tourism: Balance Sheets and Financial Meltdown
The contract signed by Chung Ju Yung in 1998 promised the North monthly payments of $12 million through February 2005 for a total of $942 million, regardless of the number of tourists. This was on top of the $308 million paid for the development rights and the $104 million cost of building the facilities. Under these terms over 350,000 tourists would have to visit annually for the project to begin making a profit. For the first two years, the number of travelers was high, as Koreans born in the North and some Koreans born in the South, who were curious about North Korea, visited the mountain -- 148,074, in 1999 and 213,009 in 2000. However, the number declined dramatically to 57,879 in 2001.
As the financial success of the tourism project became questionable, the ROK government provided a financial boost. For example, when payment to the North was delayed in February 2001 because the profit from the tours was insufficient, the ROK government provided a subsidy. Then, from April 4, 2002 to December 31, 2002, the ROK government provided subsidies of 70% for students and 60% for other tourists. By the end of 2002, the government had spent 216 billion won (about USD 8 million) for 57,218 Mt. Kumkang visitors.[4] The government also asked the Korean National Tourism Organization (KNTO) to help shore up the project,[5] allocating 900 billion won (about $77million) from the Inter-Korean Cooperation Fund in June 2001 to KNTO for investment in Kumgang tourism.
Also, the terms of payment were renegotiated. In June 2001, the agreement changed from a monthly lump-sum to a per-tourist payment, thereby creating an incentive on the DPRK side to increase the number of tourists.[6] However, even with this change and ROK government support, by the end of 2002, only 555,000 tourists total had visited, and the project continued to founder. The cost of the trip was a major obstacle to financial sustainability. The sea route was expensive, about 600,000 won ($500) per person for an overnight trip, the equivalent of four nights and five days travel to South Asia. Initially there were no accommodations, and travelers had to return to the ship at night.
Hyundai’s huge deficit[7] was rooted in structural problems, which could not be sustainably resolved by South Korean government subsidies. Hyundai and the Kim Dae Jung administration hadn’t accurately calculated the level of South Korean interest in visiting North Korea in a purely tourist capacity, the disincentive created by the high cost, nor the negative impact of the lack of a security guarantee. Pyongyang’s extreme attempts to protect its people from influence of tourists from the South, which required strict security control in the mountain resort, diminished the attractiveness of visiting. Detention of a tourist in 1999 for a short conversation with North Korean guide further decreased interest in visiting, and stirred criticism in South Korea.
Triggering Changes in North Korean Law
The 1999 detention resulted in the South Korean government suspending tourist visits for two months while Hyundai and the North concluded new regulations guaranteeing security for visitors to the mountain.[8] Deteriorating economic conditions inside North Korea as well as tourism triggered further changes in North Korean laws and practices, beginning with the July 1, 2002 economic reforms that targeted a substantial increase in both prices and wages; a shift in the price-fixing mechanism; changes in the distribution system and other changes intended for the “construction of a strong and prosperous state.”[9]
Inter-Korean governmental talks on promoting took place at Mt. Kumgang in September that year. Subsequently, North Korea designated the mountain as an international tourist zone on November 25 2002, and provided a legal structure for South Koreans and foreign investors to conduct business. Economic and jurisdictional laws were enacted to implement the new plan. [10]
Revitalization of tourism continued as the two Koreas agreed to open a land route and guarantee security for travelers in its territories in January 2003.[11] The new route decreased the price of a visit, and allowed for different packages from one-day to two-night/three-days. New regulations were adopted to manage the new arrangements, [12] such as regulations on entry and exit, tourist and long-term residence in the Mt. Kumgang tourist zone, and customs on April 29, 2004.[13] Regulations on foreign currency, labor and advertisements were established on May 31, 2004.[14] Tourism increased as result of these changes; the number of tourists rose from 84,727 in 2002 to 345,006 in 2007.
Mt. Kumgang: Non-Tourist Purposes
Mt. Kumgang tourism increased the number of people visiting North Korea and increased inter-Korean trade, as South Korean tourists tend to spend a lot on North Korean goods.[15] From late 1998 through 2008, nearly 1.95 million tourists visited the mountain. Mt. Kumgang has also been the site of various types of inter-Korean dialogues, both non-governmental and governmental. The two Koreas held government level talks in 2001 and 2002 to increase tourism; these were followed by working-level meetings on the reconnection of railroad and roads, and marine transportation cooperation to promote tourism.
Nine Inter-Korean Red Cross talks have taken place at Mt. Kumgang, with the first one on family reunions taking place shortly after the June 2000 Summit. Subsequently, Mt. Kumgang has been host to most of the reunions for separated family members from the 4th one in April 2002 through the 16th in September 2009.[16] In addition, many inter-Korean activities organized by South Korean NGOs, churches and unions have taken place at Kumgang Mountain. In addition, the Roh Moo-hyun government encouraged a “work-study program for unification of the Korean Peninsula” that took place at Mt. Kumgang. With government funding of about 104 billion won (USD 9 million), 44,478[17] South Korean students and teachers participated between December 3, 2004 and February 26, 2008. And Mt. Kumgang was the site of the first Inter-Korean athletic meeting in August 14, 2002.[18]
Criticism of Mt. Kumgang Tourism
South Korean criticism of the Mt. Kumgang tourism project centered first on the lack of fundamental security measures to protect tourists in the Mt. Kumgang resort area. Such criticism intensified in the wake of two major incidents during: detention of a South Korean tourist for about one week in 1999 and the killing of a South Korean tourist in 2008. As noted above, after the 1999 detention, new measures were introduced that provided more legal protection of tourists visiting the tourist site. However, the 2008 shooting demonstrated that the security guarantees defined in the 2004 laws are insufficient to protect tourists who leave the zone within which the security guarantees are applicable.[19]
Second, conservative South Koreans are critical of the engagement policy in general and the two inter-Korean economic projects in particular. They believe that cash-payments given to the DPRK have at best stabilized the regime and at worst been used by the North for missile and nuclear weapons development as well as for arms-build up. Particular attention has been focused on the $450 million remitted by the Hyundai group to Pyongyang in early of June, apparently provided in complicity with the Kim Dae-Jung government for the realization of the South-North summit meeting of June 15, 2000.[20]
Where We Are
Although on August 17 2009, Hyundai Group chairwoman, Hyun Jeong-eun visited Kim Jong-il and agreed to resume the suspended tourism of Mt. Kumgang promptly, as of this date, tourism has not resumed since the July 2008 shooting incident.[21] However, South Korean Vice Unification Minister Hong Yang-ho declared that Seoul does not intend to link the nuclear issue to the tourism project; and recent events seem to support this statement.[22] Although the tourism project has not officially been re-opened, other activities are taking place at Kumgang Mountain. For example, the 16th reunion was held in the reunion center in Kumgang mountain -- for its first time since it was completed in July 2008.[23] And the Inter-Korean Buddhists Joint Ceremony was held at Mt. Kumgang, marking the first Inter-Korean social exchange since the July 11, 2008.[24] The Lee Myung Bak administration said that inter-Korean exchanges would not be affected by a naval clash that took place on November 10. [25]
Kim InSung and Karin Lee
Last Updated November 10, 2009
[1] Under South Korea’s National Security Law, travel by South Korean citizens to North Korea without South Korean government permission remains illegal.
[2] For more information on the characteristics of Kumgang Mountain , see <www.tour2korea.com>
[3]Vines Stephen, “The cattle diplomat makes history,” The Independent News, June 17, 1998
< http://www.independent.co.uk/news/the-cattle-diplomat-makes-history-1165543.html >
[4] MOU 2009, White Paper 2009 (Cooperation Fund 2008) [Korean], Ministry of Unification, South Korea
<http://www.unikorea.go.kr/>
[5] “KNTO to Join Mt. Kumgang Tour Project,” People’s Daily Online (China), June 20, 2001
< http://english.people.com.cn/english/200106/20/eng20010620_73070.html>
[6] Hyundai paid 25million dollars monthly from December 1998 to May 1999, totaling 150 million dollars and paid 8million dollars from June 1999 to February 2000 per month totaling 72 million dollars. From then on, Hyundai promised to pay 12million dollars until February 2005 for the remaining 720million dollars. But Hyundai could send only 6million dollars monthly from February 2001 to May 2001, leaving them 24 million dollars in default. In May 2001, Hyundai and North Korea agreed that Hyundai would pay the remaining 24 million dollars soon, and from that point forward to pay 100 dollars per person, not a lump sum..Su-yul, Oh, “김대중 정부의 대북정책과 금강산 사업의 평가 [North Korea Policy of KDJ Government and Evaluation of Kumgang Mountain Tourism]”, 한국 동북아 논총 25(2002): 129-146.
[7] “North Korea Plays Nice With Brethren From the South,” Julie Chao (China), March 6, 2003
<http://juliechao.com/articles/nk-kumgang.html>
[8] Hyundai and APPC agreed on establishing ad hoc special committee to deal with any violation of North
Korea’s law. In-young Kim, “금강산 관광과 남북한 협상 [Kumgang Tourism and Inter-Korean
Negotiation]”, 협상연구 6 (2000)
[9] Ihk-pyo Hong, “A Shift Toward Capitalism? Recent Economic Reforms in North Korea”, East Asia Review 14(2002):
93-106.
[10] “DPRK Adopts Law on Mt. Kumgang Tourist Zone,” People’s Daily Online, Nov 25, 2002
< http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200211/25/print20021125_107424.html >
[11] “South Korean Civilians Cross MDL for Trial Overland Tour to North,” Choson Silbo, Mar 1, 2003
<http://www1.korea-np.co.jp/pk/189th_issue/2003030105.htm>
[12] Ho-yul Song, “금강산 관광산업의 현황, 문제점 및 개선 방안에 관한 연구 [A Study on the Present
Situations, Problems and Improvements of the Guemgangsan Tourism Business]”, 한국사진지리학회 14 (2004):1-35.
[13] “Regulations on Operation of Mt. Kumgang Tourist Zone Adopted,” Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), May
26, 2004. < http://www.kcna.co.jp/>
[14] Hyun-sun Park, “남북관광교류협력이 북한 변화에 미치는 영향과 교류협력 과제 [The Impact of Inter-Korean
Tourism Exchanges and Cooperation on Change in North Korea]”, 북한연구학회보 9 (2006)
[15] According to Hyundai Asan, monthly sales in 2008 were USD 2.8 million, up 100 percent month-on-month in comparison with 2007. Chan-hee Kim, “금강산 면세점 인기몰이 [Sharp Increasing in Sales in Duty Free Shops in Kumgang Mountain],” Kukmin Ilbo , June 20, 2008. <http://news.kukinews.com/article/view.asp?page=1&gCode=kmi&arcid=0920946704&cp=nb>
[16] Reunions of separated members were first held in 1985 in Seoul and Pyongyang. After the June 2000 16,212 Koreans (North and South) participated in family reunions. In addition, video reunions were held 7 times, with a total of 3,748 Koreans participating. MOU 2009, White Paper 2009, Ministry of Unification. <http://www.unikorea.go.kr>
[17] The first period of the program was held from December 3, 2004 to February 27, 2005. There were forty five visits, totaling 19,368 students and teachers (18,028 were students, accounting for 93%). The Roh government provided 28.5 billion won (about $2.46 million). During the second period (December 22, 2005 to March 8, 2006), forty visits were made by a total of 16,398 participants (This time the emphasis was on the teachers, in order to maximize benefits throughout the school system; 13,986 teachers participated. The government spent 47.9 billion won (about $4.1 million). The third period was held from January 13, 2008 to February 26 that year. There were twenty four visits with 8,711 participants. Students were 4,153 including 47 university students. The government provided 27.01 billion won (about $2.3 million). MOU 2009. White Paper 2009 (Cooperation Fund 2008) [Korean], Ministry of Unification. <http://www.unikorea.go.kr>
[18] The inter-Korean match grew out of the post-June summit agreement to march together at in the opening ceremony of the 2000 Sydney Olympics. See John Feffer, North Korea South Korea: U.S. Policy at a Time of Crisis (Seven Story Press: New York 2003), pp. 51.
[19] According to the chapter 11 of the inter-Korean agreement signed on January 2004 (The Agreement on the Entry and Stay in Kaesong Industrial Zone and Mt. Kumgang Tourist Zone), the agreement and laws only pertain to South Koreans inside the Mt. Kumgang resort grounds or Kaesong Industrial Zone. Therefore, South Koreans outside of the resort grounds would not be protected by the 2004 agreements. Instead, they would be subject to North Korean laws. Ministry of Unification, South Korea. <http://dialogue.unikorea.go.kr>
[20]Although Hyundai admitted to making a secret $500 million payment to the North just days ahead of the historic 2000 summit, its purpose remains controversial. Hyundai claims it should be considered a payment to the North for an economic cooperation plan between Hyundai and North Korea encompassing seven economic projects. However, the agreement wasn’t signed until two months later, on August 22, 2000. In 2003, a South Korean special prosecutor appointed by legislators accused the former Kim Dae-jung government and Hyundai of paying $100 million and $350 million respectively in exchange for the summit meeting. The prosecutor found the plaintiffs guilty of an illegal money transfer and Special Envoy to North Korea, Park Ji-won, was sent to jail along 7 other KDJ administration officials. KDJ avoided prosecution; the prosecutor determined that his was a Presidential Act, and, as such, was legal. Park was exonerated in 2009. The special prosecutor also found that the FSS (Financial Supervisory Service) was involved in lending money to Hyundai from IBK (Industry Bank of Korea). Of the $450 million transferred, $50 million spent on infrastructure was deemed legitimate (which is why the press sometimes reports $450 million and $500 million). See Ha-young Kim, “법원, 대북송금 절차상 유죄 인정[The Supreme Court Confirmed the Original Trial of Money Transfer to North Korea Guilty],” Pressian (South Korea), September26, 2003
<http://www.pressian.com/article/article.asp?article_num=60030926114928&Section=03
[21] “DPRK to Resume Tourism Projects with ROK Hyundai,” China Daily, August 17, 2009
< http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2009-08/17/content_8576647.htm>
[22] Hyun-kyung Kang, “Seoul Not to Link NK Nukes to Tourism, Korea Times,” September 29, 2009. <http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2009/09/116_52680.html >
[23] “Long-separated Korean Families Have Reunion,” CNN, September 26, 2009.
<http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/09/26/koreas.reunion/index.html>
[24] Although the Lee Myung-bak government approved the visit, it reduced participants from the 100 who had applied to 21. Young-hun Chang, “남북 불교도 금강산 신계사서 통일기원 합동법회 [The South-North Buddhists Joint Ceremony at Singye Temple at Mt. Kumgang],” Yonhap News Agency (South Korea), October 15, 2009
<http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2009/10/13/0200000000AKR20091013179400014.HTML?did=1179m>
[25] Choe Sang-Hun, Navies of 2 Koreas Exchange Fire, New York Times, November 10, 2009 <http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/world/asia/10korea.html>

